A Reading Assignment

b703f8de7700e210f92e415286db8b9bThe March 6 New Yorker contains an excellent article by Evan Osnos, David Remnick, and Joshua Yaffa, “Active Measures  What lay behind Russia’s interference in the 2016 election – and what lies ahead?”   Osnos, Remnick, and Yaffa provide the context for understanding Putin’s efforts to tip the 2016 US presidential election, a context that is necessary to understand Trump and the precarious position of our democracy.  In particular, they detail the history of both Russia and the US during the Cold War to sway elections, the rampant Western opportunism to the embarrassment of Russia with the fall of the Soviet Union, and the determination of Putin to restore Russia as a world player.  After the US invasion of Iraq, the article notes that Putin “had grown deeply disenchanted and came to feel that the West was treating Russia as a ‘vassal’.”   In 2007, Putin “charged that the United States had ‘overstepped its national borders in every area’ and that the expansion of NATO was directed against Russian interests.”   When, in 2014, the pro-Russian leader of the Ukraine was overthrown, the authors note that Putin feared the Ukraine would gravitate toward the West.  In response, Russia invaded Crimea.  Into this context came the embrace of active “hybrid war” against the West, using cyber tactics and disinformation as “an essential component of Russia’s efforts to exert influence…”  The 2016 US presidential election provided an excellent opportunity for Russia to carry out it’s increasingly mature cyber war and disinformation tactics – particularly in opposition of Hillary Clinton who Putin viewed as an anti-Russian hawk.

The effectiveness of those tactics, and the Trump electoral victory, have played strongly to Russian interests by destabilizing the Western alliances.   The authors quote Strobe Talbott, a former adviser to President Clinton, to the effect that “Trump, by showing so little regard for the institutions established by the political West in the past seventy years, is putting the world in danger.”  Noting that the West is in danger of losing a second Cold War,  Talbott notes that, were that to happen, the “not quite apocalyptic” result would be years and years before a liberal world order could be reestablished.  He notes that an even graver scenario would be “‘an unravelling,’ in which we revert to ‘a dog-eat-dog’ world with constant instability and conflict even if it doesn’t go nuclear.  But, with the proliferation of nuclear powers, it is easy to see it going that way, too.”

The extent to which Trump played an active part in the Russian undermining of the 2016 electoral process remains uncertain, if subject to increasing suspicion.   Of course, the  numerous contacts of Trump aides, such as Paul Manafort and Michael Flynn, with Russian officials is being documented on a daily basis.  Mr. Flynn has now resigned.  Mr. Sessions has unaccountably perjured himself  at his confirmation hearing.  The specter that is looming, the elephant in the room, is that Trump may have directly colluded in action that, by any standard, constitutes the deliberate undermining of the Western liberal democracies and treason against our state.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “A Reading Assignment

  1. Curious as to Putin´s long term strategies in regards to his expansionism and reabsorption of the breakaway republics. I would be curious to learn as to what he realisitically expect to regain over his lifetime.It´s quite apparent that he will make every effort to rule Russia for a lifetime.

    Donald owes the Russian plutocrats, mafioso and who knows who else more than a billion dollars. He owes Western banks 650 million. This is but another ploy on his to go for broke and considering his has gone that way six times already, will this be the death knoll for his financial empire?

    What exactly is the deal? I doubt that the golden shower video tape has affected his decision to play by Putin´s strategy. Donald is a crass, narcissistic sociopath who could care less if the tape were released. Knowing the klutz, he will claim the tape to be fake. He has spent the past 7 years crying FAKE! anyway without serious repercussion to his political base.

    Once the gas pipeling goes through Ukraine, how much control will he be able to exercise over its prices? Will he be able to pull off what OPEC did in 74? And what Hussein of Iraq tried in 90? How easy will he be able to cripple the Western Europe economies and get them to lift the sanctions, giving him free rein in Crimea and then Ukraine. Give an expansionist enough rope will he be able to hang the West and move into the Baltics?

    Liked by 1 person

    • I don’t know Geof. All good questions. My best guess is that Trump is basically a “day-to-day” opportunist who uses his unusual skills as a bully and manipulator to eat off other peoples plates. Time will tell if he doesn’t get taken down.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s